Are metrics meaningful?
How do we measure the impact of research? And are the metrics we measure of value? These questions, and more, were discussed at this year’s COPE European… Read more »
How do we measure the impact of research? And are the metrics we measure of value? These questions, and more, were discussed at this year’s COPE European… Read more »
Following a thorough investigation, we can now provide a further update on our discovery last year of attempts to manipulate the peer review process at several… Read more »
A workshop on publication bias in animal research reveals the importance of publishing negative results and the role of preclinical study registration. But is… Read more »
It’s two years now since the journals BMC Pharmacology and BMC Clinical Pharmacology merged to create BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology. Chris Morrey, the… Read more »
As the human genome sequence was completed, so the deep analysis of it began in earnest with the ENCyclopedia Of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project – intended to… Read more »
After months of work nominating, whittling down, discussing, dare I say arguing, and finally voting, we can now announce that the winners of BioMed Central’s… Read more »
There are lots of discussions about peer review happening at the moment, it seems April is a busy month. My colleagues took part in peer review debates in… Read more »
Each year the BioMed Central Research Awards recognize the best freely available open access research published within our journals. The awards acknowledge… Read more »
The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) has published a response to Dubois et al. who have criticised the way online journals have… Read more »
The question may seem obvious but the area of authorship can be a thorny topic, for researchers and editors alike. As Tim Albert and Liz Wager note in their… Read more »