Peer review – do we need gradual improvements or a revolution?
How editors conduct peer review, how this process is evolving and whether we can trust the new players entering the field, the responsibilities of reviewers and… Read more »
How editors conduct peer review, how this process is evolving and whether we can trust the new players entering the field, the responsibilities of reviewers and… Read more »
How to convey information was an emerging theme of the Council of Science Editors Annual Meeting that I have recently attended. This year about 450… Read more »
BioMed Central editors looked into the quality of reviewer reports and investigated several different factors that may influence it. The study published in BMJ… Read more »
Last Thursday, Digital Science organized their first Spotlight event, held at their offices in central London. The topic: 'Open data for researchers - the… Read more »
I recently attended the 12th European Association of Science Editors (EASE) Conference in Split, Croatia. The meeting was based at the University of Split… Read more »
At our Editors’ Conference on 14 May 2014 we had an opportunity to discuss conducting high quality peer review and avoiding the pitfalls. The panellists were… Read more »
Scientific journal publishing has undergone significant changes in the last couple of decades with the digital revolution and the rise of open access journals.… Read more »
“We spend a lot of time oiling and polishing this machine, but we have no idea if it’s working”. This quote succinctly summarizes how a lot of editors… Read more »
Maria Kowalczuk and Jigisha Patel, BioMed Central’s Biology and Medical Editors will be presenting two posters at the Peer Review Congress in Chicago on 8-10… Read more »
A recent Research Hive Seminar organized by the Library of the University of Sussex featured presentations from Maria Kowalczuk, BioMed Central’s Deputy… Read more »