<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
        >

    <channel>
        <title>BMC blog networkStephanie Boughton &#8211; BMC blog network</title>
        <atom:link href="https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/blog/author/stephanieharriman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com</link>
        <description></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:53:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-GB</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        
            <item>
                <title>What are the challenges of open peer review?</title>
                <link>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2016/06/15/challenges-open-peer-review/</link>
                <comments>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2016/06/15/challenges-open-peer-review/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Boughton]]></dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer review]]></category>

                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://7.31877</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin-right: 5px;"><img width="140" height="110" src="https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2016/06/sign-109141_1280-140x110.jpg" class="attachment-bones-thumb-140 size-bones-thumb-140" alt="sign-109141_1280" /></div>Last week I took part in a <a href="https://www.openaire.eu/events/eventdetail/388/53%7C54%7C55%7C56%7C57%7C58/workshop-open-peer-review-models-benefits-and-limitations">workshop</a> ‘Open Peer Review: Models, benefits and limitations’ organised by <a href="https://www.openaire.eu/">OpenAIRE</a>. As a member of the panel, I shared what I see as the challenges of open peer review.]]></description>
                                <wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2016/06/15/challenges-open-peer-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
                                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Retrospectively registered trials: the Editors&#8217; dilemma</title>
                <link>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2016/04/15/retrospectively-registered-trials-editors-dilemma/</link>
                <comments>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2016/04/15/retrospectively-registered-trials-editors-dilemma/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 14:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Boughton]]></dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Medical Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editorial policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency in research]]></category>

                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://7.31758</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin-right: 5px;"><img width="140" height="110" src="https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2016/04/water-880462_1920-140x110.jpg" class="attachment-bones-thumb-140" alt="Making the process more transparent" /></div>Prospective clinical trial registration aims to address publication and reporting bias. Unfortunately, not all clinical trials are registered before they start. Here we discuss the dilemma faced by editors when receiving submissions reporting a  clinical trial that was not registered prospectively, and a new policy for increasing transparency when a trial was registered after participant recruitment has begun.  ]]></description>
                                <wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2016/04/15/retrospectively-registered-trials-editors-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
                                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Quiz: Are you on the right path to publication?</title>
                <link>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2016/03/21/quiz-right-path-publication/</link>
                <comments>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2016/03/21/quiz-right-path-publication/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Boughton]]></dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early career researchers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How to get published]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhD]]></category>

                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://7.31717</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin-right: 5px;"><img width="140" height="110" src="https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2016/03/16821475026_7448fe3d6b_z-140x110.jpg" class="attachment-bones-thumb-140" alt="16821475026_7448fe3d6b_z" /></div>Getting your work published in a journal can be a long and challenging process, but by following some simple rules you could be one step closer to success. To conclude our series where we advise you on ‘<a href="https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/tag/how-to-get-published/">How to get published’</a>, we're putting your knowledge to the test, are you preparing and writing your manuscript correctly? Find out here.]]></description>
                                <wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2016/03/21/quiz-right-path-publication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
                                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Addressing bias in peer review</title>
                <link>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2016/03/18/addressing-bias-peer-review/</link>
                <comments>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2016/03/18/addressing-bias-peer-review/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Boughton]]></dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early career researchers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer review]]></category>

                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://7.31713</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin-right: 5px;"><img width="140" height="110" src="https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2016/03/IMG_6085-140x110.jpg" class="attachment-bones-thumb-140" alt="IMG_6085" /></div>How can we address bias in peer review? How can we make the system more effective? How can early career researchers get involved? These are just some of the topics discussed at the recent <a href="https://www.alzheimersresearchuk.org/for-researchers/research-conference-2016/academic-career-development-event/">Academic Career Development Event</a> at the 2016 Alzheimer’s Research UK Conference.]]></description>
                                <wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2016/03/18/addressing-bias-peer-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
                                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>The future of peer review</title>
                <link>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2015/05/18/future-peer-review/</link>
                <comments>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2015/05/18/future-peer-review/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2015 09:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Boughton]]></dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer review]]></category>

                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://7.31065</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin-right: 5px;"><img width="140" height="110" src="https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2015/05/Flickr-Ed-Chipul-140x110.jpg" class="attachment-bones-thumb-140" alt="Looking into the future of peer review" /></div>How can we support and acknowledge peer reviewers? How can we involve early career researchers in peer review? What is the future of peer review? These are just a few of the topics I recently discussed with some of BioMed Central’s Editors.]]></description>
                                <wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2015/05/18/future-peer-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
                                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Righting peer review: Are trust and incentives the key?</title>
                <link>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2015/05/01/righting-peer-review-trust-incentives-key/</link>
                <comments>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2015/05/01/righting-peer-review-trust-incentives-key/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 11:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Boughton]]></dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>

                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://7.31017</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin-right: 5px;"><img width="140" height="110" src="https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2015/04/IMAG0850-2-140x110.jpg" class="attachment-bones-thumb-140" alt="Trust is vital to the peer review process." /></div>What can we do to increase trust in peer review? How can we encourage more researchers to take part in peer review? These were just some of the issues considered in a panel discussion on 'Righting Peer Review' at the ARCS conference earlier this week.]]></description>
                                <wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2015/05/01/righting-peer-review-trust-incentives-key/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
                                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>A case for open peer review for clinical trials</title>
                <link>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2014/06/04/a-case-for-open-peer-review-for-clinical-trials/</link>
                <comments>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2014/06/04/a-case-for-open-peer-review-for-clinical-trials/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 17:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Boughton]]></dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://7.26675</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin-right: 5px;"><img width="140" height="110" src="https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2014/06/Ethics-organ-transplantion-140x110.jpg" class="attachment-bones-thumb-140" alt="" /></div>A few weeks ago I played the part of an expert witness in the Medical Journalist Association’s mock trial, Trials on Trial. The charge was: “Is the current system of publishing clinical trials fit for purpose?” The jury’s verdict was a resounding ‘no’. You can read more about the event in Jane Feinmann’s write up...  <a class="excerpt-read-more" href="https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2014/06/04/a-case-for-open-peer-review-for-clinical-trials/" title="Read A case for open peer review for clinical trials">Read more &#187;</a>]]></description>
                                <wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2014/06/04/a-case-for-open-peer-review-for-clinical-trials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
                                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Complete reporting: more than just trials</title>
                <link>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/on-medicine/2014/06/03/complete-reporting-more-than-just-trials/</link>
                <comments>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/on-medicine/2014/06/03/complete-reporting-more-than-just-trials/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Boughton]]></dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Medical Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>

                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://6.26606</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin-right: 5px;"><img width="140" height="110" src="https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/on-medicine/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2014/06/checklist-140x110.jpg" class="attachment-bones-thumb-140" alt="checklist" /></div>Recently I attended the EQUATOR scientific meeting and annual lecture in Paris. The theme of the day was ‘improving reporting to decrease the waste of research’. The focus was not on the familiar, and very important, topic of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), but on issues that receive less attention – how to report...  <a class="excerpt-read-more" href="https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/on-medicine/2014/06/03/complete-reporting-more-than-just-trials/" title="Read Complete reporting: more than just trials">Read more &#187;</a>]]></description>
                                <wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/on-medicine/2014/06/03/complete-reporting-more-than-just-trials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
                                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Publication ethics in Europe &#8211; COPE European Seminar 2014</title>
                <link>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2014/03/26/publication-ethics-in-europe-cope-european-seminar-2014/</link>
                <comments>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2014/03/26/publication-ethics-in-europe-cope-european-seminar-2014/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Boughton]]></dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publication ethics]]></category>

                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://7.24774</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[This year the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) European Seminar was held in Brussels, the first time it has taken place outside of London. Delegates were treated to a varied and thought provoking program covering the vast topic of European perspectives on publication ethics. Publication ethics is a vitally important topic for editors, as it...  <a class="excerpt-read-more" href="https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2014/03/26/publication-ethics-in-europe-cope-european-seminar-2014/" title="Read Publication ethics in Europe &#8211; COPE European Seminar 2014">Read more &#187;</a>]]></description>
                                <wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2014/03/26/publication-ethics-in-europe-cope-european-seminar-2014/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
                                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Peer review under scrutiny</title>
                <link>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2013/11/07/peer-review-under-scrutiny/</link>
                <comments>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2013/11/07/peer-review-under-scrutiny/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephanie Boughton]]></dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open peer review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer review]]></category>

                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://7.19413</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div style="float: left; margin-right: 5px;"><img width="140" height="110" src="https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2013/11/Papers-and-laptop_iStock-Photo-140x110.jpg" class="attachment-bones-thumb-140" alt="Papers and laptop_iStock Photo" /></div>Peer review is a key process in the publication of scientific research, and often finds itself under scrutiny and the topic of debate. Discussions around the future of peer review and problems with current models have led to experiments with open peer review, post publication peer review and double-blind peer review. At BioMed Central we offer...  <a class="excerpt-read-more" href="https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2013/11/07/peer-review-under-scrutiny/" title="Read Peer review under scrutiny">Read more &#187;</a>]]></description>
                                <wfw:commentRss>https://blogs.biomedcentral.com/bmcblog/2013/11/07/peer-review-under-scrutiny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
                                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>
