Peer review – eLife goes portable
Selective journals, in particular journals that select on grounds of interest or importance, inevitably disappoint many authors of papers that ought to be published. Aspiring authors authors papers may submit their papers to three or four or even more journals in succession before acceptance, consuming referees and losing time with each submission.
So it is a good thing that eLife, which operates a particularly labour-intensive system of peer review and aims high for interest and importance, will from today be offering authors of rejected papers the option of taking the referees’ reports with them to other journals, including BMC Biology, Open Biology, and all journals published by PLoS and EMBO.
Of course it will be the authors’ choice whether they take …



